Basel II (2024)

An extension of the regulations for minimum capital requirements as defined under Basel I

Over 1.8 million professionals use CFI to learn accounting, financial analysis, modeling and more. Start with a free account to explore 20+ always-free courses and hundreds of finance templates and cheat sheets.

What is Basel II?

Basel II is the second set of international banking regulations defined by the Basel Committee on Bank Supervision (BCBS). It is an extension of the regulations for minimum capital requirements as defined under Basel I. The Basel II framework operates under three pillars:

  • Capital adequacy requirements
  • Supervisory review
  • Market discipline

Basel II (1)

The Three Pillars under Basel II

Pillar 1: Capital Adequacy Requirements

Pillar 1 improves on the policies of Basel I by taking into consideration operational risks in addition to credit risks associated with risk-weighted assets (RWA). It requires banks to maintain a minimum capital adequacy requirement of 8% of its RWA.

Basel II also provides banks with more informed approaches to calculate capital requirements based on credit risk, while taking into account each type of asset’s risk profile and specific characteristics. The two main approaches include the:

1. Standardized approach

The standardized approach is suitable for banks with a smaller volume of operations and a simpler control structure. It involves the use of credit ratings from external credit assessment institutions for the evaluation of the creditworthiness of a bank’s debtor.

2. Internal ratings-based approach

The internal ratings-based approach is suitable for banks engaged in more complex operations, with more developed risk management systems. There are two IRB approaches for calculating capital requirements for credit risk based on internal ratings:

  • Foundation Internal Ratings-based approach (FIRB): In FIRB, banks use their own assessments of parameters such as the Probability of Default, while the assessment methods of other parameters, mainly risk components such as Loss Given Default and Exposure at Default, are determined by the supervisor.
  • Advanced Internal Ratings-based approach (AIRB): Under the AIRB approach, banks use their own assessments for all risk components and other parameters.

Pillar 2: Supervisory Review

Pillar 2 was added owing to the necessity of efficient supervision and lack thereof in Basel I, pertaining to the assessment of a bank’s internal capital adequacy. Under Pillar 2, banks are obligated to assess the internal capital adequacy for covering all risks they can potentially face in the course of their operations. The supervisor is responsible for ascertaining whether the bank uses appropriate assessment approaches and covers all risks associated.

  • Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP): A bank must conduct periodic internal capital adequacy assessments in accordance with their risk profile and determine a strategy for maintaining the necessary capital level.
  • Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP): Supervisors are obligated to review and evaluate the internal capital adequacy assessments and strategies of banks, as well as their ability to monitor their compliance with the regulatory capital ratios.
  • Capital above the minimum level: One of the added features of the framework Basel II is the requirement of supervisors to ensure banks maintain their capital structure above the minimum level defined by Pillar 1.
  • Supervisor’s interventions: Supervisors must seek to intervene in the daily decision-making process in order to prevent capital from falling below the minimum level.

Pillar 3: Market Discipline

Pillar 3 aims to ensure market discipline by making it mandatory to disclose relevant market information. This is done to make sure that the users of financial information receive the relevant information to make informed trading decisions and ensure market discipline.

Related Readings

Thank you for reading CFI’s guide to Basel II. To keep advancing your career, the additional CFI resources below will be useful:

Basel II (2024)

FAQs

What is the key difference between Basel II and Basel III? ›

In Basel II, Capital Requirements were refined through Risk-weighted assets, tailoring capital allocation based on the riskiness of assets. Basel III elevated this concept by introducing Capital Buffers - the Capital Conservation Buffer, Countercyclical Capital Buffer, and Systemically Important Banks (SIB) Buffer.

What is the difference between Basel 1 and Basel 2? ›

The main difference between Basel I, II, and III was the different objectives they were established to achieve. Basel I was formed to explain a minimum capital requirement for the banks. Basel II introduced supervisory responsibilities and further improved the minimum capital requirements.

When was Basel 2 implemented in US? ›

On November 1, 2007, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (U.S. Department of the Treasury) approved a final rule implementing the advanced approaches of the Basel II Capital Accord.

What are the pillars 1 2 and 3 Basel? ›

Basel regulation has evolved to comprise three pillars concerned with minimum capital requirements (Pillar 1), supervisory review (Pillar 2), and market discipline (Pillar 3). Today, the regulation applies to credit risk, market risk, operational risk and liquidity risk.

What is Basel II in simple terms? ›

Basel II is an international business standard that requires financial institutions to maintain enough cash reserves to cover risks incurred by their operations. The Basel accords are a series of recommendations on banking laws and regulations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

What are the cons of Basel II? ›

Pros and Cons of Basel II

The subprime mortgage meltdown and Great Recession of 2008 showed that Basel II underestimated the risks involved in current banking practices and that the financial system was overleveraged and undercapitalized, despite Basel II's requirements.

How is Basel III an improvement over Basel II explain? ›

The transition from Basel II to Basel III would mark a significant shift in the global approach to banking regulation. While Basel II focused primarily on the amount of capital the banks held and how they managed risk, Basel III included new rules on liquidity, leverage, and systemic risk factors.

What is the point of Basel III? ›

Basel III is an internationally agreed set of measures developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in response to the financial crisis of 2007-09. The measures aim to strengthen the regulation, supervision and risk management of banks.

What are the benefits of Basel II? ›

Basel II's main objective is to make the banking sector extra cautious while handling highly risky assets. The capital requirement is based on risk-weighted assets now, so banks will have to charge extra spread while issuing loans to lower rating individuals/businesses.

What is Basel 2 Tier 3 capital? ›

Defined by the Basel II Accords, to qualify as tier 3 capital, assets must have been limited to 2.5x a bank's tier 1 capital, have been unsecured, subordinated, and have an original maturity of no less than two years.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Catherine Tremblay

Last Updated:

Views: 6239

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (67 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Catherine Tremblay

Birthday: 1999-09-23

Address: Suite 461 73643 Sherril Loaf, Dickinsonland, AZ 47941-2379

Phone: +2678139151039

Job: International Administration Supervisor

Hobby: Dowsing, Snowboarding, Rowing, Beekeeping, Calligraphy, Shooting, Air sports

Introduction: My name is Catherine Tremblay, I am a precious, perfect, tasty, enthusiastic, inexpensive, vast, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.